May 31

BP Releases Details of Lower Marine Riser Package (LMRP) Cap Procedure
Source: http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=9033657&contentId=7062491

Installing a Lower Marine Riser Package (LMRP) Cap is a containment option for collecting the flow of oil from the MC252 well. The LMRP is the top half of the blow out preventer (BOP) stack.

The installation procedure first involves removing the damaged riser from the top of the BOP.

A remote operated hydraulic shear will be used to make two initial cuts and then that section will be removed by crane. A diamond wire saw will then be placed to cut the pipe close to the LMRP and the final damaged piece of riser will be removed.

The LMRP Cap is designed to seal on top of the riser stub. The seal will decrease the potential of inflow of seawater as well as improve the efficiency of oil recovery. Lines carrying methanol also are connected to the device to help stop hydrate formation.

The device will be connected to a riser extending from the Discoverer Enterprise drillship.

The LMRP Cap is on site, and it is anticipated that this option would be available for deployment by the end of May.

Schematic of LMRP Cap procedure is outlined on drawings below.

    

Share
May 31

There is too much pressure coming from the well. I suggest pushing either a stream of heavy drilling fluid through choke and kill lines (Scenario A) or a stream of methanol (Scenario B).

In the first scenario the heavy drilling fluid can reach up to 10% penetration into the well, as we saw on Friday May 28, and will reduce gases and oil from coming out of BOP opening set for LMRP cap connection. This is a preferable method because it decreases risks of gas “kicks” and reduces chances of gas explosion on Enterprise Drillship when they start “receiving” mix of mud & oil at the surface. The drillship should be ready to siphon mud & oil mixture out of LMRP cap upon cap connection to BOP pipe opening. It is likely BP needs to continue pumping mud into choke and kill lines to minimize impact of gas “kicks” and to have a better control over well’s pressure. 

In the second scenario a stream of Methanol through choke and kill lines will dilute gases and oil coming out of the well and prevent them from forming icy slush upon contact with cold ocean water (hydrates, clathrates) and will increase chances of successful connection of LMRP cap to BOP opening. The problem with this method is Enterprise Drillship will need to prepare for possible gas “kicks”.  Using mud is a preferable option as it allows for better control over well’s pressure.

A stream of methanol from LMRP cap will decrease icy slush, but likely is not sufficient to combat large amounts of gas from MC252 well. This well is prone to gas kicks. As Kent Wells said it has more gas than BP originally thought.

Share
May 31

The President speaks in Grande Isle, LA after assessing the response to the Deepwater BP Oil Spill and reaffirms the Administration’s commitment to doing all in its power to help protect the environment and the livelihoods of the population affected by the spill. May 28, 2010.  (Source: White House Video Channel  http://www.youtube.com/whitehouse )

Share
May 31

WhiteHouse Video: President Obama speaks about the Federal response to the Deepwater BP Oil Spill and answers questions from the media. (May 27, 2010)

Share
May 30

Princeton researchers: High Fructose Corn Syrup causes more weight gain in tested animals
Sources:   http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S26/91/22K07/
Video Report:   http://www.wwltv.com/news/local/High-fructose-corn-syrup-not-so-sweet-for-your-diet.html

Share
May 30

The following are twitter icons one can use for their website or blog. Courtesy of TwitterIcon.Com

Twitter Icon      Twitter Icon   

        

         

Sample HTML code for these twitter icons:

<a href=”http://twitter.com/imchemist” target=”_blank”><img title=”By: TwitterIcon.com” src=”http://ikonstantin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/twitter9.png” border=”0″ alt=”" /></a>

Share
Tagged with:
May 30

After Top Kill failed, the decision was made to proceed with LMRP Cap installation, a backup plan. Schematic below depicts installation process and equipment needed for this operation.

Graphics adopted from DeepwaterHorizonResponse.Com ; Source: http://bit.ly/dDmgOH

LMRP-cap (click to enlarge)

Share
May 29

BP issued an update at 8:40pm Saturday, May 29, 2010 regarding their efforts to stop oil flow from the MC252 well in the Gulf of Mexico. Source: http://www.bp.com/genericarticle.do?categoryId=2012968&contentId=7062487

BP started the “top kill” operations to stop the flow of oil from the MC252 well in the Gulf of Mexico at 1300 CDT on May 26, 2010. The procedure was intended to stem the flow of oil and gas and ultimately kill the well by injecting heavy drilling fluids through the blow-out preventer on the seabed, down into the well.

Despite successfully pumping a total of over 30,000 barrels of heavy mud, in three attempts at rates of up to 80 barrels a minute, and deploying a wide range of different bridging materials, the operation did not overcome the flow from the well.

The Government, together with BP, have therefore decided to move to the next step in the subsea operations, the deployment of the Lower Marine Riser Package (LMRP) Cap Containment System.

The operational plan first involves cutting and then removing the damaged riser from the top of the failed Blow-Out Preventer (BOP) to leave a cleanly-cut pipe at the top of the BOP’s LMRP. The cap is designed to be connected to a riser from the Discoverer Enterprise drillship and placed over the LMRP with the intention of capturing most of the oil and gas flowing from the well. The LMRP cap is already on site and it is currently anticipated that it will be connected in about four days.

This operation has not been previously carried out in 5,000 feet of water and the successful deployment of the containment system cannot be assured.

Drilling of the first relief well continues and is currently at 12,090 feet. Drilling of the second relief well is temporarily suspended and is expected to recommence shortly from 8,576 feet.

Share
May 29

Details of Failed Blowout Preventer (BOP) on Deepwater Horizon Rig
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/11/science/11blowout.html

BOP specifics:

- a huge stack of equipment
- height 53 feet
- width 16 feet
- weight 325 tons
- controlled by elaborate circuits custom built from pipes, not wires,
- uses hydraulic fluid instead of electrons
- has sealed electronic and hydraulic components
- has multiple redundant and backups systems
- has five hydraulic rams
- sits on the seabed between the well and the pipe that carries oil to the surface, the riser

Excerpts from the article:

Hydraulic circuits can leak, seals can erode, and other problems can crop up when the devices are tested, as they are supposed to be regularly.

Investigators still do not know exactly why this B.O.P., which was tested 10 days before the accident, did not do its job.

The key to safely drilling for oil or gas is controlling the pressure in the well-hole. The primary method involves circulating special fluid, generically called “mud,” down through the drill pipe and back up the space between the pipe and a larger pipe called a casing.

The mud recipe can be altered to make it lighter or heavier as needed. As long as the hydrostatic pressure of the column of mud exceeds the pressure in the formation being drilled, the well remains under control.

But if the drill bit hits an area of higher pressure, there can be a surge of oil or gas into the mud — a “kick” in oil-speak. That is when operators on the drilling rig will activate the blowout preventer to block the upward flow of higher-pressure mud, which if not controlled can quickly be followed by oil and gas.

In the blowout preventer, one or more massive rams mounted perpendicular to the flow can be activated, sealing the space between the drill pipe and the bore of the preventer, covering the opening if there is no drill pipe or even shearing the pipe if necessary. Another device on the stack, a doughnutlike rubber ring called an annular preventer, can seal the space between the drill pipe and the bore but still allow the pipe.

However the flow is blocked, the mud can be diverted into a separate line with a valve called a choke. By closing this valve, the open loop of circulating mud becomes a closed one, and back pressure builds until it exceeds the pressure of the kick. Then heavier mud can be circulated and drilling can be resumed.

The principle of using brute-force rams to control a well was developed nearly a century ago. “The basic function hasn’t changed,” said Bob Sherrill, who built and repaired blowout preventers for 20 years and now runs Blackwater Subsea, a Houston company that supplies personnel for deepwater work. “What has changed are the materials — they’ve gotten a lot more sophisticated, a lot stronger.”

They have also been made more corrosion resistant, to counteract problems caused largely by hydrogen sulfide gas found in oil deposits. Still, Mr. Sherrill said, the harsh conditions mean that preventers must be rebuilt every seven years or so.

Preventers used on land are far easier to repair, and the rams can be locked in place manually or closed with wrenches if hydraulics fail. In water, below about 1,000 feet, they can be serviced only by robotic submersibles, and locking the rams in place requires a second hydraulic system.

There is also no way to close them by hand if the hydraulics fail. So the control systems on subsea B.O.P.s are far more elaborate and redundant, with two identical pods on each stack.

Those pods are huge — 20 feet tall in some cases — and filled with a hundred or more hydraulic valves, electrically operated solenoids and other devices. The works are enclosed to protect them from pressure and moisture, but exposed, the gleaming array of pipes and switches, fabricated from high-strength steel, looks like a techno version of an old telephone operator’s console.

Graeme Reynolds, manager of B.O.P. controls at Oceaneering International, a company that is best known for its robotic submersibles used in deepwater work, said pods had to be custom-built for each blowout preventer.

“We can’t go into the industrial hydraulics market and buy stuff that will satisfy us,” he said. “It won’t meet our thermal criteria, it won’t meet our pressures. So we have to make all that stuff ourselves.”

As a result they can be extremely expensive — as much as $18 million or more for the controls on a typical deepwater B.O.P.

In normal use, the controls are activated by an electrical line that accompanies a hydraulic line running from the drill rig. If a decision is made to close a ram, a signal activates solenoids that open valves, allowing water-based hydraulic fluid to flow into the proper cylinders on the stack. Special pressure tanks on the drill ship called accumulators, which contain hydraulic fluid and a charge of nitrogen, provide a burst of power to close the rams, usually in about 30 seconds.

But the control pods have backup systems, including accumulators on the stack itself that can provide enough hydraulic power to close rams if power is lost from the surface. A deadman device fires some of the switches if both electric and hydraulic power are lost. (A 2003 report for the Minerals Management Service, the federal agency that oversees offshore drilling, found that deadman devices often were not armed because of fear that they would activate prematurely, necessitating costly fixes. BP said the deadman switch did not activate in the April 20 blowout.)

As a final backup, B.O.P.s must be able to be activated by robotic submersibles. So the control units have special valves that can use hydraulic fluid provided by the submersible using a probe called a hot stab. BP officials said that since the accident they had been able to activate some of the rams to some degree using this method.

If the blowout preventer is damaged or contains an unsealable section of pipe, the best hope for stopping the leak, other than drilling a relief well, is to route heavy mud around the preventer stack and into the well. This would involve first reconfiguring the preventer, something that is difficult but not impossible, experts say.

Other than that, though, a damaged blowout preventer is really not repairable until it is brought to the surface.

Share
May 29

The wellhead was equipped with a blowout preventer, a 40-foot stack of devices designed to rapidly seal the well. But the preventer failed. Source: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/05/25/us/20100525-topkill-diagram.html

Share
preload preload preload